<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chapter 10 &#8211; Financial Statement Analysis for Value Investing</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.penmanpope4value.com/chapter/chapter-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.penmanpope4value.com</link>
	<description>Financial Statement Analysis for Value Investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 13:56:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">244141626</site>	<item>
		<title>The AI Monitor: Assessing Earnings Quality</title>
		<link>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/the-ai-monitor-assessing-earnings-quality/</link>
					<comments>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/the-ai-monitor-assessing-earnings-quality/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Penman &#38; Pope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 05:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.penmanpope4value.com/?p=2072</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[See the Nissim monograph on applying AI for assessing earning quality: Nissim, D. 2024. Earning Quality, Fundamental Analysis and Equity [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See the Nissim monograph on applying AI for assessing earning quality:</p>
<p>Nissim, D. 2024. Earning Quality, Fundamental Analysis and Equity Valuation, Columbia Business School. At <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3794378" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><u>https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3794378</u></a>.</p>
<p>The following paper applies pattern recognition to detect anomalies in accounting data:</p>
<p>Pattern Recognition and Anomaly Detection in Bookkeeping Data, by Pierre Liang, Aluna Wang, Leman Akoglu, and Christos Faloutsos. Obtain the paper from Pierre Liang at the Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University.</p>
<p>Here’s a paper that applies large language models (LLMs) to identify sustainable earnings, testing alternative approaches. It leaves an open question: Can AI perform better than using business judgment to identify unsustainable items?</p>
<p>Shaffer, M. and C. Wang. 2024. Scaling Core Earnings Measurement with Large Language Models. At <a href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=4979504" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><u>https://ssrn.com/abstract=4979504</u></a>.</p>
<p>This paper applies machine learning to predict misstatements:</p>
<p>Bertomeu, J., E. Cheynel, E. Floyd, and W. Pan. 2021. Using Machine Learning to Detect Misstatements. <em><i>Review of Accounting Studies </i></em>26 (2), 468-519.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/the-ai-monitor-assessing-earnings-quality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2072</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FASB Update: More Income Statement Detail</title>
		<link>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/fasb-update-more-income-statement-detail/</link>
					<comments>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/fasb-update-more-income-statement-detail/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Penman &#38; Pope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 05:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.penmanpope4value.com/?p=2066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In July 2024, the FASB voted to require more detailed disclosure on expenses, in footnotes rather than on the face [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In July 2024, the FASB voted to require more detailed disclosure on expenses, in footnotes rather than on the face of the income statement. The detail includes employee compensation, and inventory purchases. In addition, the components of selling expenses must be detailed.</p>
<p>Here is an example of the new presentation from the proposal:</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-2069 size-full" src="https://www.penmanpope4value.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Picture2-2.png" alt="" width="500" height="623" srcset="https://www.penmanpope4value.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Picture2-2.png 500w, https://www.penmanpope4value.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Picture2-2-241x300.png 241w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/fasb-update-more-income-statement-detail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2066</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Valuation Allowance: The Boeing Company</title>
		<link>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/valuation-allowance-the-boeing-company/</link>
					<comments>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/valuation-allowance-the-boeing-company/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Penman &#38; Pope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 05:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.penmanpope4value.com/?p=2061</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[With the grounding of its 737 MAX aircraft after two crashes, production issues in the 787 Dreamliner program, and delays [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the grounding of its 737 MAX aircraft after two crashes, production issues in the 787 Dreamliner program, and delays with its 777X program, Boeing reported significant losses over the years, 2020-2023. That led to tax benefits for losses carried forward for tax purposes, resulting in increases in deferred tax assets. With loss carry forwards, firms must assess whether it is more likely or not that they will not have future profits against which they can realize the tax benefit. If so, they must record a valuation allowance, reducing deferred tax assets, as explained in chapter 10. Boeing decided to record the valuation allowance ($ millions):</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th>2019</th>
<th>2020</th>
<th>2021</th>
<th>2022</th>
<th>2023</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Net profit (loss) before tax</td>
<td>(2,259)</td>
<td>(14,476)</td>
<td>(5,033)</td>
<td>(5,022)</td>
<td>(2,005)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Income tax benefit (expense)</td>
<td>1,623</td>
<td>2,535</td>
<td>743</td>
<td>(31)</td>
<td>(237)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Valuation allowance</td>
<td>118</td>
<td>3,094</td>
<td>2,243</td>
<td>3,162</td>
<td>4,550</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Chapter 10 vividly reports the effect on net income when Delta Air Lines reversed its valuation allowance. <em><i>Beware: </i></em>If Boeing judges at any time in the future that it is more than 50% likely it will return to profitability, it will reverse the valuation allowance, increasing reported profit.  This is not sustainable profit. That is  bleed back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/valuation-allowance-the-boeing-company/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2061</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impairments and Profit Margins: The Boeing Company</title>
		<link>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/impairments-and-profit-margins-the-boeing-company/</link>
					<comments>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/impairments-and-profit-margins-the-boeing-company/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Penman &#38; Pope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 04:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.penmanpope4value.com/?p=2058</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Chapter 9 pointed to potential quality issues with program accounting. This accounting is applied for production of goods that take [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chapter 9 pointed to potential quality issues with program accounting. This accounting is applied for production of goods that take several years to build, like ships and, in the case of Boeing, commercial and defense aircraft. Production costs are accumulated in inventory as production proceeds. However, if it is estimated that the costs will not be recovered, the inventory is written down. Chapter 9 reported that Boeing made substantial write-downs in 2020 and 2021 with production delays on its 777X program. They referred to them as “reach-forward losses.” In $ millions:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-2338 size-full" src="https://www.penmanpope4value.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Chapter-10-img-3.png" alt="" width="447" height="83" srcset="https://www.penmanpope4value.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Chapter-10-img-3.png 447w, https://www.penmanpope4value.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Chapter-10-img-3-300x56.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 447px) 100vw, 447px" /></p>
<p>Recognizing anticipated losses is good conservative accounting. However, there is something else to watch out for: If and when the planes are delivered and revenues recognized, cost of goods sold will be lower and profit margins higher because production costs have been written off. Those margins will not be because of reduced production costs but because of the earlier write-off. In 2020, although production proceeded with costs incurred, Boeing reported that production costs in inventory were near zero because of the write-off. So the cost of planes produced that year will have zero cost of goods sold when sold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/impairments-and-profit-margins-the-boeing-company/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2058</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Restructurings: One-time Items Really?</title>
		<link>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/restructurings-one-time-items-really/</link>
					<comments>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/restructurings-one-time-items-really/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Penman &#38; Pope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 04:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.penmanpope4value.com/?p=2056</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Restructuring charges are usually treated as one-time items. But the analyst must be careful.  Restructurings of businesses can take a [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Restructuring charges are usually treated as one-time items. But the analyst must be careful.  Restructurings of businesses can take a number of quarters or even years.</p>
<p>Up to 2002, firms would book an estimate of the total cost of a restructuring as a liability obligation then reduce the liability as costs were incurred. As explained in chapter 10, that led to the abuse of overestimating the liability than bleeding back any estimated cost not incurred to boost income in the future⸺the big bath problem. FASB Statement 146 and IAS 37 checked this practice by requiring restructuring charges to be booked mainly as they were incurred. That, however, had the effect of losing the information in the estimated liability for restructuring charges to be recognized over several periods in the future. And initial charges recognized as incurred might not be one-time items, leaving open the question of whether there will be further charges subsequently.</p>
<p>A case in point is Procter &amp; Gamble (PG). By 2001, the firm had booked restructuring charges as they were incurred over seven quarters, totaling $1.3 billion, with indications the total would later go to $4.0 billion. With so many consumer products succeeding or failing, P&amp;G’s restructuring charges are likely to be recurring. So are they really unsustainable items? As of 2024, the company was conducting an annual restructuring program “to maintain a competitive cost structure,” with annual restructuring charges ranging from $250 to $500 million. For the fiscal quarter ending September 2024, a restructuring charge of $886 million was booked. Better to see these charges as repeating costs of doing business?</p>
<p>By 2025, Xerox had reported impairments of goodwill in three out of the four previous years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/restructurings-one-time-items-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2056</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vignettes: Change in Depreciation Expense</title>
		<link>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/vignettes-change-in-depreciation-expense/</link>
					<comments>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/vignettes-change-in-depreciation-expense/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Penman &#38; Pope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 04:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.penmanpope4value.com/?p=2054</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In fiscal-year 2023, Microsoft changed the useful life on its servers and network equipment from 4 years to 6 years. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fiscal-year 2023, Microsoft changed the useful life on its servers and network equipment from 4 years to 6 years. The effect on operating income before tax from the lower depreciation was to increase it by $3.4 billion, net income by $3 billion, and EPS by $0.40. With $211.9 billion in revenue, that is a 1.6% effect on operating profit margin before tax.</p>
<p>Amazon did the same in 2022, reducing depreciation expense by $3.6 billion and increasing net income by $2.8 billion. In early 2024, it said it would again reduce depreciation by further extending useful lives, increasing operating income before tax by $3.1 billion for the 2024 year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/vignettes-change-in-depreciation-expense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2054</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>R&#038;D and Taxes</title>
		<link>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/rd-and-taxes/</link>
					<comments>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/rd-and-taxes/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Penman &#38; Pope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 14:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.penmanpope4value.com/?p=2052</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Under U.S. tax law, firms get a tax credit for investment in R&#38;D, an incentive to increase R&#38;D investment. A [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under U.S. tax law, firms get a tax credit for investment in R&amp;D, an incentive to increase R&amp;D investment. A paper finds that a one standard deviation in a “strategic” increase in R&amp;D for tax purposes reduces the effective tax rate by 1.7%. The practice results in higher R&amp;D in the income statement and lower operating profit, along with an increase in uncertain tax benefit liabilities under FASB 48.</p>
<p>See Laplante, Skaife, Swenson, and Wangerin, <em><i>Journal of Accounting and Public Policy </i></em>38 (2019), 89-105.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/rd-and-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2052</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Macro Channel Stuffing</title>
		<link>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/macro-channel-stuffing/</link>
					<comments>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/macro-channel-stuffing/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Penman &#38; Pope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 14:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.penmanpope4value.com/?p=2050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Economists have long been skeptical about statistics published by the Chinese government. So, with the ailing Chinese economy, it came [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economists have long been skeptical about statistics published by the Chinese government. So, with the ailing Chinese economy, it came somewhat of a surprise that the government announced that GDP growth in 2024 met its 5% target.</p>
<p>That was partly explained by higher export growth. However, in the last quarter of 2024, Chinese firms were fast tracking their shipments to the U.S. to avoid the anticipated high tariffs on Chinese imports that the expected next U.S. president, Donald Trump was promising for 2025. That is channel stuffing. Look for a decrease in Chinese income from exports in 2025 as the inventory buildup from the channel studying reduces the demand for Chinese goods (as well as from lower exports because of the tariffs). That will have a negative effect on Chinese GDP growth for 2025, forecast to be 5% once more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/macro-channel-stuffing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2050</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penetrating Revenue Growth</title>
		<link>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/penetrating-revenue-growth/</link>
					<comments>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/penetrating-revenue-growth/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Penman &#38; Pope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 14:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.penmanpope4value.com/?p=2046</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The top-line income statement number, revenue, is in most cases the most important number driving the bottom line so reported [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The top-line income statement number, revenue, is in most cases the most important number driving the bottom line so reported revenue growth draws attention. Understanding where the growth is coming from is crucial. Revenue is composed of sales and fees such as franchise fees and royalty fees. They need to be separated. But the drivers of the sales component need also to be identified. The following diagram decomposes growth in the sales component into its drivers:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-2047 size-full" src="https://www.penmanpope4value.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Screenshot_19.png" alt="" width="746" height="298" srcset="https://www.penmanpope4value.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Screenshot_19.png 746w, https://www.penmanpope4value.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Screenshot_19-300x120.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 746px) 100vw, 746px" /></p>
<p>An example of sales generated by investment asset growth or not is same store sales versus sales from new store openings in retail. The P, Q, FX breakdown is discussed in chapter 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/penetrating-revenue-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2046</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fraud Detection Models</title>
		<link>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/fraud-detection-models/</link>
					<comments>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/fraud-detection-models/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Penman &#38; Pope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.penmanpope4value.com/?p=2044</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here’s a paper that develops a score that indicates the likelihood of fraud: Beneish, M. 1999. The Detection of Earnings [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s a paper that develops a score that indicates the likelihood of fraud:</p>
<p>Beneish, M. 1999. The Detection of Earnings Management. <em><i>Financial Analysts Journal </i></em>55 (5), 24-36.</p>
<p>The following sites give for more detail on the score and its implementation:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.affaridiborsa.com/articoli/123-m-score-8-indici-in-uno-per-scovare-le-frodi-contabili.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><u>https://www.affaridiborsa.com/articoli/123-m-score-8-indici-in-uno-per-scovare-le-frodi-contabili.html</u></a></p>
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beneish_M-score" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><u>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beneish_M-score</u></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.penmanpope4value.com/fraud-detection-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2044</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
